Birthright Citizenship Cannot Be Rewritten by Legislation, Court Rules

After the Supreme Court preserved birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, President Trump urged Congress to end it with legislation, claiming a constitutional amendment isn’t necessary. Legal scholars—and several Republican supporters—say the majority opinion effectively bars changing the rule by statute; Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence suggested a possible legislative workaround, but the consensus is that only a constitutional amendment or a future court reversal could alter birthright citizenship. Some lawmakers discuss targeted immigration/birth-tourism measures, but those would face constitutional challenges if they conflict with the Court’s interpretation. In short, current law grants birthright citizenship broadly, and changing that would require a constitutional amendment or a future shift in jurisprudence.
- Trump’s Dubious Claim that Birthright Citizenship Could Still Be Overturned with Legislation FactCheck.org
- Opinion | Roberts Gets the 14th Amendment Wrong WSJ
- ‘Birth tourism’ in Trump administration’s sights after supreme court setback | First Thing The Guardian
- The Birthright Decision Was Surprisingly Close, Some Legal Scholars Say The New York Times
- Trump’s audacious bid to end birthright citizenship was not an entire loss at the Supreme Court CNN
Reading Insights
1
14
8 min
vs 9 min read
94%
1,784 → 108 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on FactCheck.org