Clarence Thomas's Supreme Court Conflict of Interest with Billionaire Friend Harlan Crow.

TL;DR Summary
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did not recuse himself from a 2004 appeal involving a company owned by Harlan Crow, a GOP mega-donor and friend of Thomas, despite previously stating that Crow had no business before the court. The case ultimately benefited the company, Trammell Crow Residential. Thomas is currently under scrutiny for accepting gifts and trips from Crow without disclosing them. While Thomas' conduct did not violate any Supreme Court code of conduct, legal ethics experts suggest that it could prompt the court to adopt a code of conduct or use the code applied to other federal judges.
- Clarence Thomas didn't recuse in case with Harlan Crow: Bloomberg Business Insider
- Clarence Thomas’s Billionaire Friend Did Have Business Before the Supreme Court Yahoo News
- Supreme Court Did Review Case Involving Harlan Crow—Contradicting Clarence Thomas’s Claim Forbes
- Letter: Marshall brought honor; Thomas brings disgrace Buffalo News
- Clarence Thomas Friend Harlan Crow Had Supreme Court 'Conflict of Interest' Bloomberg
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
21
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
84%
619 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Business Insider