DOJ Escalates Alaska Senate Probe with Target Letters as Election Day Concludes

4 min read
Source: AP News
DOJ Escalates Alaska Senate Probe with Target Letters as Election Day Concludes
Photo: AP News
TL;DR

The U.S. Justice Department has intensified its criminal investigation into the 2026 Alaska U.S. Senate race by issuing target and preservation letters to several individuals, including prominent Democratic attorney Marc Elias. This escalation follows a New York Times report alleging that Mary Peltola’s campaign recruited retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan, who shares a name with incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, to confuse voters. While the DOJ has issued over 100 subpoenas and FBI agents have visited donors, no criminal charges have been filed. The investigation coincides with Election Day, where Alaska remains the final swing state with polls open, and follows a federal judge’s dismissal of a DOJ lawsuit attempting to block the certification of the race results.

Key points

  • The Justice Department sent target letters to individuals, including attorney Marc Elias, signaling they are potential defendants in the criminal inquiry into the Alaska Senate race.
  • The probe has issued more than 100 subpoenas and over 20 target or preservation letters, with FBI agents making home visits to donors of candidate Dan J. Sullivan.
  • A New York Times report alleged that Peltola’s campaign sought to recruit Dan J. Sullivan to siphon votes from incumbent Dan Sullivan, a claim Peltola and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee deny.
  • Alaska U.S. Attorney Michael Heyman stated that the investigation is thorough but declined to specify what crimes are being investigated, noting that no assumptions about guilt have been made.
  • The criminal probe intensified after a federal judge dismissed a DOJ civil lawsuit seeking to block the certification of the Alaska Senate race results, ruling that the government lacked standing to segregate ballots.

Background

The controversy stems from the presence of two candidates named Dan Sullivan on the Alaska ballot: incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan and retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan. The Trump administration has characterized the latter’s candidacy as a deliberate effort to confuse voters and steal votes. Prior to the current escalation, the DOJ filed a civil suit to isolate ballots, which was dismissed by Judge Sharon Gleason on November 1, 2026, due to concerns over voter secrecy and federal standing. The current criminal investigation builds on these earlier legal attempts to address what the administration views as electoral fraud, while Democrats maintain that the recruitment of a namesake candidate is a standard, if controversial, political tactic.

How outlets are covering it

The Justice Department and Attorney General Todd Blanche view the candidacy of Dan J. Sullivan as a 'fraud' and a criminal offense designed to undermine the election, with Blanche stating that everyone agrees the candidate is running solely to confuse voters. In contrast, Mary Peltola and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee deny any involvement in recruiting the candidate, with Peltola stating she was unaware of the effort and that the allegations 'backfired' by energizing her supporters. Marc Elias, a recipient of a target letter, characterized the investigation as a weaponization of the DOJ against political enemies, citing his history as a target of President Trump. Fox News emphasized the scale of the subpoena process and the involvement of Democratic operatives, while The New York Times focused on the specific recruitment tactics alleged by Peltola’s campaign. Alaska’s News Source highlighted the ongoing uncertainty of the race, noting that Alaska was the last swing state with polls open on Election Day, and that the DOJ is monitoring for potential ballot fraud despite the dismissal of its civil suit.

Why it matters

The outcome of the Alaska Senate race is critical for determining control of the U.S. Senate, as it is one of six swing states where the majority could be decided. The DOJ’s aggressive legal and criminal tactics set a precedent for how federal authorities may intervene in state-level election disputes, potentially influencing future midterm elections. The dismissal of the civil suit to block certification means the race will proceed, but the ongoing criminal probe could lead to charges against campaign officials, potentially altering the political landscape and raising questions about the boundaries of federal oversight in state elections.

What to watch

The Justice Department is expected to continue its criminal investigation, potentially leading to indictments if sufficient evidence is found. The DOJ may appeal the dismissal of its civil lawsuit to block the certification of the Alaska Senate race results. The final results of the Alaska Senate race will be determined once polls close, with the race potentially deciding the balance of power in the U.S. Senate. The DOJ is also monitoring for any reports of election-related misconduct or ballot fraud in Alaska, though no specific allegations have been detailed.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on AP News