RFK Jr. Faces Widespread Rebuke for False Anti-Arab Claims in Michigan

3 min read
Source: The Guardian
RFK Jr. Faces Widespread Rebuke for False Anti-Arab Claims in Michigan
Photo: The Guardian
TL;DR

US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced intense backlash after claiming at a Michigan campaign event that Arabs do not produce science or literature. Fact-checkers and civil rights groups condemned the remarks as racist and factually incorrect, citing numerous Arab Nobel laureates. The comments were made while supporting Republican Mike Rogers against Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, intensifying a broader wave of anti-Muslim attacks during the 2026 midterm elections.

Key points

  • Kennedy stated at a Grand Rapids rally that 500 million Arabs do not win the Nobel, Fields, or Wolf prizes, nor produce literature.
  • The Associated Press fact-checked these claims, listing multiple Arab winners of the Nobel Prize in Peace, Chemistry, and Literature since 1978.
  • The Council on American-Islamic Relations and Protect Our Care condemned the remarks as 'unvarnished racism' and a 'wildly racist tirade.'
  • Kennedy linked these claims to the Muslim Brotherhood, arguing the group created 'stagnant societies' that destroyed previous Islamic contributions to science.
  • Democratic Senator Chris Murphy and Congresswoman Hillary Scholten criticized Kennedy, with Scholten noting he lacks a medical degree and has undermined public confidence in health science.
  • Vice President JD Vance escalated the rhetoric in Howell, Michigan, linking El-Sayed to violent protests in Paris, while Trump previously called El-Sayed a 'jihadist.'

Background

This incident occurs during the 2026 US midterm elections, specifically in the competitive Michigan Senate race between Republican Mike Rogers and Democrat Abdul El-Sayed. El-Sayed, a Muslim physician, has faced sustained attacks from the Trump administration and GOP allies alleging ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which he has repeatedly denied. Previous coverage noted that Kennedy’s remarks were part of a broader pattern of anti-Muslim rhetoric by administration officials, including Trump’s recent comments in Port Huron. The backlash follows earlier fact-checks and calls for Kennedy’s removal from his role as HHS Secretary.

How outlets are covering it

The Guardian and NBC News emphasize the factual inaccuracy of Kennedy’s claims, highlighting the AP fact-check and the condemnation from civil rights groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations. NBC News notes that Kennedy’s comments were part of a broader pattern of anti-scientific rhetoric, referencing his previous anti-vaccine views. AP News provides a detailed breakdown of specific Arab Nobel laureates, such as Ahmed Zewail and Naguib Mahfouz, to refute Kennedy’s assertions. Yahoo News focuses on the personal and historical contrast, quoting Joe Scarborough’s claim that RFK Jr.’s father, Bobby Kennedy, would be 'ashamed' of his son for denigrating people based on faith. All sources agree that the remarks were racially charged and factually wrong, but they differ in emphasis: The Guardian and NBC focus on the institutional and civil rights response, AP focuses on the factual correction, and Yahoo focuses on the political and familial legacy.

Why it matters

The incident highlights the escalating use of racial and religious rhetoric in US midterm elections, particularly targeting Muslim and Arab communities. It raises questions about the role of government officials, such as the HHS Secretary, in political campaigns and the potential impact of such rhetoric on public trust in health science and democratic norms. The backlash from both political and civil society groups indicates a significant public and institutional rejection of these claims, potentially influencing voter sentiment in key swing states like Michigan.

What to watch

Kennedy is scheduled to speak at a rally in Des Moines, Iowa, on Wednesday. The Michigan Senate race between Rogers and El-Sayed remains highly competitive, with polling showing El-Sayed trailing. Further fact-checks and potential legal or ethical challenges to Kennedy’s remarks may emerge as the election approaches. The broader anti-Muslim campaign by the Trump administration and its allies is expected to continue, with more attacks on El-Sayed and other Muslim candidates likely in the coming weeks.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on The Guardian