SCOTUS Ruling Risks Hamstringing the Next President’s Agenda

TL;DR Summary
Slate argues that the Court’s ruling on removing heads of independent agencies could leave a future president with limited leverage to shape leadership in certain commissions, since the Federal Vacancies Reform Act doesn’t apply to multimember agencies. The result could be a split: a new president might inherit holdover members and risk a quorum loss, while an outgoing president could purge commissioners to lock in a policy agenda. The piece urges Congress to extend the Vacancies Act to multimember agencies or convert some to single-head bodies, though reform is unlikely while Trump remains in office and Sotomayor warns of chaos and legal uncertainty.
Topics:nation#federal-vacancies-reform-act#independent-agencies#multimember-commissions#politics#supreme-court#trump
- The Supreme Court Just Helped Trump Hamstring the Next Democratic President Slate Magazine
- Opinion | This ‘conservative’ Supreme Court decision could be the left’s friend The Washington Post
- A President With More Control but Less Power The Atlantic
- After Slaughter and Cook: future Fed fights, and maybe some midnight firings SCOTUSblog
- Scholars call Slaughter ruling 'Brexit moment' for U.S. American Banker
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
9
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
94%
1,783 → 103 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate Magazine