Supreme Court Rejects Independent Legislative Theory, Signaling Trouble for Ohio Case
TL;DR
The US Supreme Court ruling in the Moore v. Harper case rejected the independent state legislature theory (ISLT), which has been used by Republicans to establish authority over the courts in redistricting battles. The ruling likely spells doom for a similar Ohio case, where GOP leaders argued that the state legislature had the authority to determine the constitutionality of district maps. The court's rejection of the ISLT is seen as a victory for originalism and the constitutional framework of the US government. The ruling suggests that the Ohio case will be moot, and redistricting in the state may proceed without court intervention.
Topics:nationpolitics#constitutional-interpretation#independent-state-legislature-theory#ohio#politics#redistricting#us-supreme-court
- US Supreme Court decision rejects independent legislative theory, likely spells doom for Ohio case Ohio Capital Journal
- Supreme Court limits state powers over federal elections MSNBC
- Republicans are too reckless for even this Supreme Court | Opinion Raleigh News & Observer
- Opinion | The Supreme Court Rejected a Dangerous Elections Theory. But It's Not All Good News. The New York Times
- Opinion | The Supreme Court rejects independent state legislature theory. Phew. The Washington Post
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Ohio Capital Journal