House Lawmakers Threaten to Gut Senate's College Sports Bill Over Conference Realignment

The Protect College Sports Act, passed by the Senate 77-22, faces severe opposition in the House. Lawmakers are pushing to remove provisions limiting conference expansion, particularly the cap on power league membership. Senate leaders warn that House amendments could kill the bill, while the House remains in recess until after the midterm elections.
Key points
- The Senate passed the 170-page Protect College Sports Act 77-22, with 26 Democrats and one Independent joining Republicans.
- House members are drafting a letter to leadership demanding the removal of the conference expansion provision, which caps power leagues at 20 teams.
- The bill includes a three-year probationary period for schools moving conferences, a reduction from the original five-year proposal.
- Senate staff members state that the bill is a 'final product' and that wholesale House revisions would torpedo the legislation.
- The House is not scheduled to return to Washington until after the November midterm elections, creating a timeline crisis before the December 18 end of the Congress.
- President Trump and his appointee Randy Levine are urging passage, criticizing Florida and Miami schools for trying to undermine the bill to protect the ACC.
Background
The Protect College Sports Act was passed by the Senate on September 29, 2026. The legislation establishes federal rules for athlete compensation, transfers, and eligibility, and grants the NCAA a limited antitrust exemption. It was negotiated by Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Maria Cantwell. Previous coverage noted concerns that the House recess until after the midterm elections would prevent the bill from becoming law before the current Congress ends in December.
How outlets are covering it
On3 reports that House members are preparing to significantly amend the bill, with some believing it may not reach the floor for a vote due to divisiveness. They highlight a draft letter from over a dozen House lawmakers, mostly from Florida, North Carolina, and South Carolina, demanding the elimination of the expansion provision. The Washington Post emphasizes the bipartisan nature of the Senate vote, noting that Cruz worked with Democrats to overcome a filibuster, and highlights criticism from Democrats like Sen. Cory Booker who argued the bill does not do enough for athletes. Live 5 News focuses on the perspective of South Carolina lawmakers, who support the national framework to avoid the patchwork of state-specific NIL laws. ESPN's source was unavailable due to a server error.
Why it matters
The bill's fate in the House will determine whether the federal government imposes a uniform framework on college athletics, including caps on athlete payments and restrictions on transfers. Failure to pass the bill could leave the industry in a fragmented state with varying state laws, while passage could reshape conference realignment and athlete compensation nationwide.
What to watch
House leadership will decide whether to take up the bill before the December 18 end of the Congress. If amendments are made, the Senate would need to ratify them, a process that could be delayed by new demands from senators. The House is currently in recess until after the November midterm elections.
- College sports bill facing pressure in the House: 'We won’t pass language to blow up the ACC' On3
- U.S. Senate votes 77-22 to pass Protect College Sports Act ESPN
- After years of NIL changes, SC lawmakers back national framework Live 5 News
- How Ted Cruz, once a Republican gadfly, became a bipartisan dealmaker The Washington Post
- Nick Saban says NIL ‘created an environment with no control, no guardrails’ NewsNation
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on On3