Supreme Court's Decision on Gun Ban for Domestic Abusers Could Impact Survivors' Rights

The Supreme Court appears likely to uphold a federal ban on alleged domestic abusers possessing firearms, as several conservative justices signaled reluctance to adopt an extreme interpretation of the court's history-focused approach to gun-rights cases. Justices Gorsuch and Barrett did not seem troubled by the domestic-abuser restriction, while Kavanaugh raised concerns about the potential impact on the federal background-check system. The case tests how the court will apply a new approach for evaluating the constitutionality of gun restrictions, requiring investigation into analogous gun regulations in early American history. The government argued that Congress has the authority to disarm those who are not law-abiding responsible citizens, while the defense raised concerns about unfair procedures and deprivation of constitutional rights. Liberal justices questioned the wisdom of using history to assess modern gun restrictions and highlighted the relevance of bans on slaves owning guns.
- Supreme Court looks poised to uphold ban on guns for accused domestic abusers POLITICO
- Supreme Court reviews domestic abuser gun ban MSNBC
- Opinion | How to Handle Domestic Violence and Gun Rights The Wall Street Journal
- Opinion: Why American women of childbearing age now have another Supreme Court case to watch CNN
- Supreme Court will consider whether to uphold protections for survivors of domestic violence The Hill
Reading Insights
0
9
5 min
vs 6 min read
87%
1,045 → 141 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on POLITICO