Judges Question DOJ Candor as Trust in Federal Courts Frays

1 min read
Source: The New York Times
Judges Question DOJ Candor as Trust in Federal Courts Frays
Photo: The New York Times
TL;DR Summary

A wave of federal rulings accuses Justice Department lawyers of dishonesty and withholding information, calling into question the long-held trust that government counsel will be candid in court; from Rhode Island's hospital records case to Chicago grand-jury transcripts and related matters, judges fault misrepresentations, redactions, and delays, prompting outside counsel investigations and debates over ethics, with experts warning that eroding candor could undermine the federal judiciary even as DOJ officials defend their conduct.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

7

Time Saved

9 min

vs 10 min read

Condensed

96%

1,96673 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The New York Times