All articles tagged with #justice department
The U.S. Justice Department has opened an antitrust investigation into ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News regarding their collective suspension of White House pool coverage. The probe follows a dispute where the networks halted footage distribution after the administration barred CNN from the White House, leaving major events without independent video coverage.
The Justice Department has issued a new memo allowing senior political appointees, including Attorney General Todd Blanche, to participate in political activities such as speaking at rallies and serving as party officers. This reverses stricter Biden-era restrictions and expands on previous loosening of rules by former AG Pam Bondi.
The Justice Department is using executive privilege to block testimony about President Trump’s involvement in the Kennedy Center’s closure and renovation plans, a move legal experts call unprecedented. While the National Symphony Orchestra continues to rehearse in the shuttered building, the administration argues the center is structurally unsafe, creating a stark contradiction between official claims and ongoing operations.
The U.S. Department of Justice has finalized new regulations that ease restrictions on silencers and certain firearms governed by the National Firearms Act (NFA). This move follows a 2023 change that removed the NFA tax and a recent presidential directive to drop appeals against federal rulings that loosened oversight on these weapons. The changes allow for less government oversight in the ownership and sale of short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and silencers, though they do not affect widely used rifles like AR-15s. Existing prohibitions on these weapons remain in place, but the regulatory landscape has shifted significantly toward reduced federal control.
Federal prosecutors are presenting evidence to a grand jury to potentially charge former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson with lying to Congress regarding her 2022 testimony on the January 6 Capitol attack. The case is being handled by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division rather than the local U.S. Attorney’s office, a move critics view as politically motivated. While no final decision on charges has been made, the investigation stems from a referral by Republican lawmakers and focuses on discrepancies between Hutchinson’s account of President Trump’s actions and sworn testimony from Secret Service agents.
The Justice Department is seeking to indict former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson for lying to Congress regarding her testimony about President Trump's actions on January 6, 2021. The case is being pursued by the Civil Rights Division, a move that has drawn scrutiny for bypassing standard local prosecution channels. Hutchinson, a key witness for the House Select Committee, faced a federal grand jury earlier this week, though she has not yet been subpoenaed. Critics view the action as part of a broader pattern of using federal resources to target political opponents, while the Department declined to confirm or deny the investigation's status.
The U.S. Justice Department has issued a directive requiring employees to replace the term 'artificial intelligence' with 'super intelligence' in official communications and court filings, aligning with President Trump's recent executive order. This move aims to reframe public perception of AI as a transformative American innovation rather than a potential threat, while simultaneously sidelining safety advocates who have warned of its risks.
A former FBI intelligence analyst, Jill Fields, filed a whistleblower complaint alleging that the Trump administration ordered the FBI to investigate peaceful anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles in violation of the First Amendment. Fields claims that President Trump and White House officials, including Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove and FBI Director Kash Patel, pressured the bureau to open probes after viewing a TikTok video of demonstrators. The Justice Department and White House denied the allegations, stating that investigations target violent acts and obstruction of law enforcement, which are not protected by the First Amendment. Senator Alex Padilla has demanded answers from the DOJ regarding the scope of these investigations.
A former FBI analyst alleges the White House pressured the bureau to investigate peaceful anti-ICE protesters, violating First Amendment rights. The whistleblower claims agents were diverted from cartel cases to pursue these probes, leading to her resignation. The Justice Department denies the claims, asserting investigations targeted violent acts, while Senator Alex Padilla has demanded answers from agency leaders.
The US Justice Department has initiated denaturalization proceedings against 40 foreign-born citizens, marking the largest coordinated effort in modern history. The actions, filed between August and October 2026, target individuals accused of fraud, espionage, and serious crimes. This move follows a 2025 directive to expand citizenship revocation and represents a significant escalation in the administration's immigration enforcement strategy.
The US Justice Department has filed denaturalization actions against 40 naturalized citizens, the largest single-period batch in modern history. The cases, filed between August and October 2026, allege that these individuals concealed material facts or committed serious crimes, including espionage and sexual offenses, during their naturalization processes. Officials describe the move as a necessary measure to protect national security and integrity, while critics and legal experts note the historical rarity of such actions and the high legal bar required to strip citizenship.
The US Justice Department has filed denaturalization actions against 40 naturalized citizens, the largest single-period batch in the current administration. The cases, filed between August and October 2026, allege that these individuals concealed material facts or committed serious crimes, including espionage and sexual offenses, during their naturalization processes. Officials describe the move as a necessary measure to protect national security and integrity, while critics and legal experts note the historical rarity of such actions and the high legal bar required to strip citizenship.
The US Justice Department has filed 40 new petitions to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans, marking the largest single batch of denaturalization actions in modern history. Attorney General Todd Blanche stated the cases target individuals who concealed 'material facts' or committed serious crimes, including espionage and fraud, during their naturalization processes. The actions, filed between August and October 2026, involve citizens from countries including Mexico, China, and Pakistan. While the DOJ frames this as a national security measure, critics argue the expansion of denaturalization risks statelessness and serves as a political tool against perceived enemies, a shift from the historically rare use of such laws.
A federal judge in Florida has ruled that the decades-old federal statute criminalizing noncitizen voting is unconstitutional, dealing a significant blow to the Trump administration's aggressive enforcement campaign ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The ruling, which dismisses a case against a Jamaican national, asserts that voter qualifications are a power reserved to the states, not Congress. While the decision applies only to the specific defendant, it puts dozens of pending federal cases at risk and has prompted the Justice Department to appeal to the 11th Circuit Court. The outcome could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, challenging the legal foundation of the administration's election integrity agenda.
The U.S. Department of Justice has initiated denaturalization proceedings against 40 foreign-born citizens, alleging they concealed criminal histories or committed fraud to obtain citizenship. Filed between August 21 and October 2, 2026, these cases represent the largest single-period filing under the current administration. The charges involve individuals from countries including Colombia, Mexico, and Pakistan, with offenses ranging from money laundering and espionage to sexual abuse of minors.