Supreme Court Conservatives Question Motives Behind South Carolina GOP Gerrymandering
Conservative justices on the Supreme Court expressed doubt that South Carolina GOP lawmakers engaged in racial gerrymandering when redrawing congressional lines to benefit Republicans. The case, which could impact which party controls the House after next year's elections, involves a district reworked in 2020 to benefit the GOP and current incumbent Rep. Nancy Mace. The South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and a Black voter argue that race dominated the decision-making process, while conservatives suggest that politics, not race, were the primary consideration. The liberals on the court argue that the maps were adopted by considering race as a predominant factor, violating the equal protection clause of the US Constitution.
- Conservative justices suggest South Carolina GOP gerrymandering was based on politics, not race CNN
- The Supreme Court’s Republicans appear determined to save a GOP gerrymander in South Carolina Vox.com
- Supreme Court skeptical of South Carolina racial gerrymandering claim NBC News
- Supreme Court conservatives cast doubt on South Carolina racial gerrymander The Hill
- Justices Split on South Carolina Voting Map Said to Be Racial Gerrymander The New York Times
Reading Insights
0
10
5 min
vs 6 min read
90%
1,082 → 111 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN