Supreme Court Divided on Alleged Racial Gerrymandering in South Carolina
Members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority appear ready to reinstate a South Carolina voting map that a lower court had ruled was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The case raises the question of how to distinguish between race and partisanship in drawing voting maps when Black voters overwhelmingly favor Democrats. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. expressed skepticism towards the lower court's findings, suggesting that the evidence of race being the predominant factor was circumstantial and consistent with the partisan goal of creating a conservative-leaning district. The case highlights the challenge of disentangling race and politics in voting rights jurisprudence.
- Justices Split on South Carolina Voting Map Said to Be Racial Gerrymander The New York Times
- Conservative justices suggest South Carolina GOP gerrymandering was based on politics, not race CNN
- The Supreme Court’s Republicans appear determined to save a GOP gerrymander in South Carolina Vox.com
- The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistricting WCBD News 2
- Is SC’s 1st District racially gerrymandered? US Supreme Court weighs arguments The State
Reading Insights
0
8
5 min
vs 6 min read
90%
1,023 → 100 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times