Supreme Court Upholds Protections for Social Media Platforms from Liability for User Content

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Twitter and Google in two lawsuits that could have had far-reaching implications for the internet. In Twitter v. Taamneh, the court unanimously ruled that social media platforms cannot be held liable for hosting terrorist-related content that has only a distant relationship with a specific terrorist attack. In Gonzalez v. Google, the court dismissed a case that accused Google's subsidiary YouTube of aiding and abetting terrorism. The court's decision leaves in place a lower court ruling that protects social media platforms from a broad range of content moderation lawsuits under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
- Supreme Court shields Twitter from liability for terror-related content and leaves Section 230 untouched CNN
- Supreme Court finds Twitter not liable for aiding terrorists MSNBC
- Supreme Court rules for social media giants in cases over third-party content, declines to address Section 230 Fox Business
- Supreme Court sides with Google and Twitter, avoids Section 230 ruling The Washington Post
- Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post CNBC
Reading Insights
0
9
4 min
vs 5 min read
89%
969 → 105 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN