Student Editor Demits Dartmouth Provost’s Removal Over AI Writing Allegations
A Dartmouth student opinion editor argues that College Provost Santiago Schnell should be fired for allegedly using artificial intelligence to draft major publications. The author contends that Schnell’s use of AI violates academic honor principles and undermines the institution’s credibility, especially given recent investigations by The Dartmouth and Semafor. While Schnell admits to using AI for editing, the article claims evidence suggests he relied on it heavily for writing. The piece also criticizes the broader administration for prioritizing AI partnerships and publicity over rigorous academic standards, suggesting this culture contributed to the provost’s conduct.
Key points
- Eli Moyse, a Dartmouth student and opinion editor, calls for the immediate dismissal of Provost Santiago Schnell.
- Moyse cites investigations by The Dartmouth and Semafor suggesting Schnell used AI extensively to write or edit publications, including a Washington Post op-ed.
- The author notes that while Schnell admits to using AI for editing, the extent of his usage appears greater than acknowledged.
- Moyse argues that using AI to draft academic or journalistic work constitutes plagiarism and violates Dartmouth’s Academic Honor Principle.
- The article criticizes the college administration for an excessive focus on AI partnerships and publicity, which it claims has compromised academic integrity.
Background
Recent coverage indicates that Dartmouth’s internal investigation using the Pangram tool found high AI-written percentages in Provost Santiago Schnell’s post-2022 writings, with median scores around 96%, while pre-2022 works appeared fully human-written. Schnell has defended his use of AI as an assistive tool, asserting he authored and reviewed final content, though critics and Pangram proponents have debated detector accuracy and bias. This current opinion piece builds on those findings, framing the issue as a breach of academic honor rather than just a technical detection dispute.
Why it matters
The incident highlights growing tensions between traditional academic integrity standards and the rapid adoption of AI tools in higher education. If a top academic officer is found to have relied heavily on AI for public-facing work, it raises questions about the credibility of institutional leadership and the enforcement of honor codes. The debate also reflects broader institutional strategies, where Dartmouth’s administration has pursued AI partnerships and initiatives, potentially creating a culture that prioritizes technological adoption over rigorous academic practice.
What to watch
Dartmouth College administration may need to address the allegations and the broader cultural critique raised by the student community. The provost’s response or the college’s official stance on the AI usage and academic honor violations will likely be the next focal point. Additionally, the college may review its AI integration policies and public relations strategies in light of the criticism that its focus on AI has compromised academic standards.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Dartmouth