"Supreme Court Examines the Permanence of Article 370 and its Impact on Kashmir"

The Supreme Court of India commenced hearing on petitions challenging the validity of the government's decision to revoke Jammu & Kashmir's special status under Article 370. The court questioned how a temporary provision became permanent and addressed the historical context of the Kashmir issue. The National Conference leader's counsel argued that Article 370 cannot be abrogated without the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly, which ceased to exist in 1957. The judges raised questions about the consequences of this argument and the acceptance of sovereignty by J&K. The court also discussed the power of the President to specify provisions of the Constitution that apply to J&K.
- Supreme Court: How can a temporary provision (Article 370) become permanent? IndiaTimes
- India top court hears petitions challenging Kashmir special status removal Al Jazeera English
- Article 370 | Omar Abdullah: 'Expect Justice On Pleas Challenging Abrogation Of Article 370' India Today
- Post-1957, President retains power to scrap Article 370: Supreme Court The Hindu
- Kashmir Petitions: An Opportunity for the Supreme Court to Uphold Federalism The Quint
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
11
4 min
vs 5 min read
88%
880 → 105 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on IndiaTimes