Carlson urges Cabinet to invoke 25th Amendment over Trump's Iran threats

Tucker Carlson has publicly called for the removal of President Donald Trump under the 25th Amendment, citing the president's recent threats of a 'nuclear attack' on Iran. The former Fox News anchor argues that such rhetoric demonstrates an inability to discharge the duties of the office, marking a significant shift in his stance and intensifying political debates over presidential fitness.
Key points
- Tucker Carlson stated that the Cabinet must remove Trump from office under the 25th Amendment.
- The call for removal is based on Trump's alleged threat to launch a nuclear attack on Iran.
- Carlson frames the threat as evidence that the president is unfit to serve.
- This statement represents a notable departure from Carlson's previous support for the administration.
Background
This development follows a series of earlier concerns regarding Trump's fitness for office. In late August 2026, Carlson had already warned that any president contemplating the first use of nuclear weapons should be removed immediately. Additionally, in early September, psychologist Mary Trump described her uncle as 'decompensating in real time' following erratic social media activity, which sparked renewed calls from critics to invoke the 25th Amendment. These prior incidents established a backdrop of ongoing scrutiny regarding the president's mental fitness and decision-making processes.
Why it matters
The 25th Amendment provides a constitutional mechanism for removing a president deemed unable to discharge their duties. Carlson's public endorsement of this process introduces a high-profile internal challenge to the administration's stability and could influence how other political figures and the public perceive the legitimacy of the current executive branch.
What to watch
The immediate focus will be on whether other members of the Cabinet or Congress support Carlson's call for invoking the 25th Amendment. Additionally, the White House is expected to respond to these allegations, potentially leading to further public debate and potential legal or political maneuvers regarding presidential fitness.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Independent