Fox News Minimizes Supreme Court Ruling and Russian Wedding Funding Amid Trump’s Declining Approval

Fox News largely ignored two major stories this week: the Supreme Court’s rejection of Trump’s mail-in ballot restrictions and ProPublica’s report on a Russian oligarch funding Donald Jr.’s wedding. While other outlets covered these extensively, Fox delayed coverage, gave minimal airtime, and focused on Trump’s criticism of the justices. This reflects a pattern of ignoring news that harms Trump’s image, prioritizing audience comfort and political power over factual reporting, even as public approval of Trump drops.
Key points
- The Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempts to restrict mail-in ballots, a significant blow to Republicans ahead of midterms.
- ProPublica reported that a Russian oligarch funded hundreds of thousands of dollars for Donald Jr.’s Bahamas wedding, becoming its most-read article of the year.
- Fox News gave the wedding story only one minute of coverage on Monday night and delayed the ballot ruling report until 11:30 PM.
- Fox hosts like Laura Ingraham, Jesse Watters, and Sean Hannity initially ignored both stories, later focusing on Trump’s attacks on the justices.
- Media Matters’ Matt Gertz described this as 'negative space' coverage, where Fox ignores Trumpian corruption to coddle its audience and maintain GOP power.
- An Axios poll found 53% of Americans view Trump as 'corrupt,' while 23% disagree, suggesting many Fox viewers may be unaware of his financial controversies.
Background
This week’s events follow a broader pattern of Fox News minimizing stories that reflect poorly on Donald Trump, such as his financial controversies and policy setbacks. The network’s approach contrasts with mainstream outlets that covered the Supreme Court ruling and ProPublica’s investigation extensively. This aligns with earlier concerns about Fox’s 'audience of one' dynamic, where coverage is shaped by Trump’s preferences rather than public interest.
Why it matters
Fox News’ selective coverage undermines its claim to be a balanced alternative to mainstream media, potentially leaving millions of viewers uninformed about critical political and financial developments. This strategy risks eroding public trust in the network and may influence voter perceptions ahead of midterms, as it downplays issues that could affect electoral outcomes and public opinion on Trump’s integrity.
What to watch
Fox may continue to downplay stories that harm Trump’s image while amplifying topics that align with its audience’s preferences. As Trump’s approval ratings decline, the network may face pressure to adjust its coverage strategy, but its current approach suggests it will prioritize maintaining political power over factual reporting. Public scrutiny of Fox’s 'negative space' coverage may grow as more stories are ignored or minimized.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on theguardian.com