Snopes rates Carlson's claim of Trump's 'we all die anyway' Iran war remark as unrated
Snopes has rated the claim that President Donald Trump told Tucker Carlson 'we all die anyway' to dismiss concerns about the Iran war as 'unrated.' The claim stems from a September 2026 interview where Carlson alleged that Trump acknowledged the war's risks but dismissed them with fatalistic logic. The White House neither confirmed nor denied the exchange, with spokesperson Davis Ingle calling Carlson a 'whiny turncoat.' Snopes noted that while Carlson's account is detailed, there is no independent evidence to verify or disprove the specific words used by the president.
Key points
- Snopes rated the claim that Trump told Carlson 'we all die anyway' as 'unrated' due to lack of independent evidence.
- Carlson claimed the conversation occurred four days before the U.S.-Israel attack on Iran that began the war on Feb. 28, 2026.
- In an NPR interview, Carlson stated Trump acknowledged the war's risks but dismissed them by saying 'in the end, we all die anyway.'
- White House spokesperson Davis Ingle called Carlson a 'whiny turncoat' and did not confirm or deny the specific exchange.
- Carlson also claimed Trump admitted Iran's nuclear program was eliminated in June 2025, a fact Snopes confirmed based on prior airstrikes.
Background
This claim emerged amid a broader shift in Tucker Carlson's political stance, where he has publicly called for the removal of President Trump under the 25th Amendment, citing threats of nuclear attacks on Iran. Earlier in 2026, tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated, with Trump signaling potential military action and Iran warning of a 'decisive war.' The current claim adds to the narrative of a fractured relationship between the former Fox News anchor and the president, with Carlson now vociferously opposing the Iran war he previously supported.
Why it matters
The claim highlights the deepening rift between Tucker Carlson and President Trump, with Carlson now publicly opposing the Iran war he previously supported. The 'unrated' status by Snopes underscores the difficulty in verifying private presidential conversations, while the White House's dismissive response reflects the polarized nature of the debate. The claim also touches on the broader question of presidential fitness and the constitutional mechanisms for removing a sitting president, as Carlson has called for the 25th Amendment to be invoked.
What to watch
Snopes has stated it will update its report if additional information surfaces that could confirm or disprove Carlson's claims. The White House has not addressed specific questions from Snopes or NPR, instead directing them to a Truth Social post from April 2026 in which Trump called Carlson and other pundits 'stupid people.' The situation remains unresolved, with no clear indication of whether the claim will be verified or debunked in the near future.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Snopes.com