All articles tagged with #ravec
Prince Harry’s invitation to stay at Buckingham Palace during his UK visit was withdrawn at the last moment after security for his family was denied by RAVEC, leading him to travel solo to attend an Invictus Games Foundation event.
Prince Harry will visit London without Meghan and their children amid a dispute over protective security; the family has not been offered taxpayer‑funded protection in the UK, and an independent Risk Management Board review has not yet taken place. Police protection would automatically be provided on royal estates, and the Sussexes could still join him for engagements elsewhere during the trip, which also marks the countdown to the Invictus Games.
Prince Harry and Prince William are reportedly in a fresh feud over who is responsible for their security arrangements, with Kensington Palace denying that the Prince of Wales has representation on the RAVEC committee, underscoring ongoing tensions between the brothers.
Prince Harry remains keen to travel to Britain on July 7 to support the Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 and hoped to bring Meghan and their children, but Vanity Fair reports that RAVEC will not provide full-time police protection for the visit. A Home Office spokesman said security policy hadn’t changed, and King Charles has offered accommodation at a royal residence (likely Buckingham Palace) where protection would apply, but it wouldn’t be continuous as the family moves between engagements. RAVEC has begun a fresh risk assessment with no conclusion yet. The trip is expected to include events with the Invictus Games Foundation in London and Chelsea, but it’s unclear whether Meghan and the children will accompany him.
Prince Harry reportedly hoped King Charles could intervene to restore taxpayer-funded police protection, but security decisions are governed by UK law and handled by the independent RAVEC committee, not royal protocol or money; Harry lost protection after stepping back in 2020, and no amount of influence can override the law.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to travel to the UK next month with their own private security detail for a highly publicized visit tied to the Invictus Games countdown; UK security decisions remain in limbo with RAVEC, and private guards cannot carry weapons or access state intelligence, reflecting ongoing tensions and the potential for a conspicuous royal moment with King Charles.
Prince Harry's lawyer is challenging the UK government's decision to strip him of his security detail, arguing that it was unfair and failed to follow proper risk analysis. Harry claims his safety is at risk due to hostility on social media and in the press. The government argues that Harry is no longer a working royal and therefore not entitled to regular security review. The committee responsible for the decision included royal family staff, including someone with whom Harry had tensions. Harry's spokesperson stated that his US security team does not have jurisdiction or access to intelligence in the UK.
Prince Harry has lost a legal challenge against the UK government's decision to bar him from paying for police protection during his visits to the UK. The Duke of Sussex and his wife, Meghan Markle, were stripped of taxpayer-funded police protection after they stepped back from being "working royals" and moved to the US in 2020. Harry's lawyers had sought a judicial review of the government's refusal of his offer to hire police officers as his private security detail, but London's High Court ruled Tuesday to deny the review.
Prince Harry has lost a legal bid to challenge the UK government's decision not to allow him to pay for police protection while he is in the country. The High Court in London ruled that he could not seek a further judicial review over the refusal of his offer to pay privately for the highly-trained officers. The decision to remove publicly-funded security was taken by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as RAVEC, which approves security for the royals and VIPs, such as the prime minister.