Lawmakers divided on solutions after SVB collapse and Senate hearing embarrassment.
TL;DR Summary
Lawmakers from both parties agree that the Federal Reserve should have done more to prevent the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, but disagree on how to prevent similar failures in the future. Democrats want to strengthen capital requirements on smaller banks, while Republicans argue that regulators already have the necessary tools. Federal Reserve Vice Chair of Supervision Michael Barr has suggested revising some of the rules governing regional banks that were loosened at the end of last decade, while several Democrats want smaller banks held to the same standards as larger financial institutions.
Topics:business#capital-requirements#federal-reserve#finance#liquidity#regulation#silicon-valley-bank
- Lawmakers agree Fed wasn't tough enough with SVB. They disagree on fixes. Yahoo Finance
- San Francisco Fed's Daly Stays Mum While Criticism Mounts Over SVB Oversight Bloomberg
- Biden to push new banking rules after Silicon Valley Bank collapse Yahoo Finance
- The system worked: The optimal number of bank failures is not zero Washington Examiner
- The Senate hearing on the collapse of SVB was embarrassing Protos
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
9
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
860 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Yahoo Finance