The Pros and Cons of Universal Deposit Insurance
The failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) has led regulators and banking experts to consider changing the deposit-insurance system so that most or even all deposits in ordinary banks are covered by insurance. Federal regulators have already invoked emergency measures to cover all uninsured deposits at SVB and, implicitly, at any other bank that might fail. Some members of Congress are drafting legislation to formally change a deposit insurance system that still resembles the Depression-era stopgap that first went into effect in 1934. Universal deposit insurance, which Congress would have to establish through legislation, might be a businesslike solution that works the way most people think of insurance: by charging a fair price for comprehensive coverage that provides robust guarantees for everybody, with no freeloaders.
- Why insuring all bank deposits might make sense Yahoo Finance
- Unlimited Deposit Insurance Can't Solve Everything The Wall Street Journal
- Is deposit insurance broken? Nine things to know about bank-account guarantees MarketWatch
- Opinion | Are all bank deposits insured? The feds must get their story straight. The Washington Post
- Why limitless universal deposit insurance could be our safest bet The Hill
Reading Insights
0
12
7 min
vs 8 min read
92%
1,476 → 125 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Yahoo Finance