Meta Cuts Midterm Political Spending by 40% After Refunds

Meta has reduced its 2026 midterm election budget by $25 million, bringing its total political spending to $40 million. The company received refunds from two advocacy groups it funded, citing 'adjustments' after successful primary outcomes. This move follows a shift in public sentiment regarding AI and regulatory scrutiny.
Key points
- Meta’s political budget for the 2026 midterms has decreased by $25 million, dropping from an initial $65 million to $40 million.
- The reduction stems from refunds received from the American Technology Excellence Project ($22 million) and a California advocacy group ($3 million).
- Meta’s spokesperson described the changes as 'adjustments' and noted that over 90% of the candidates supported in primaries won their races.
- The company’s political spending focused on state legislatures in Texas, Illinois, and California, with significant contributions to both Democratic and Republican affiliates.
- Meta’s cash reserves remain strong at over $90 billion, suggesting the reduction is strategic rather than financial.
Background
Meta launched its political initiative in September 2025 with a $65 million budget to influence state-level AI legislation. The company’s efforts were particularly active in states like California, Illinois, and Texas, where AI regulations were being debated. Recent public skepticism toward AI and reassessments by other tech donors have likely influenced Meta’s decision to scale back its political spending.
Why it matters
Meta’s withdrawal signals a potential shift in how tech giants engage with political processes, especially as public sentiment toward AI becomes more cautious. The company’s continued commitment to supporting candidates in general elections suggests it remains invested in shaping AI-friendly policies, but the reduced budget may limit its influence in key states.
What to watch
Meta will likely continue to support candidates in the general election phase, focusing on states where it has already invested. The company may also reassess its political strategy in light of ongoing regulatory and public sentiment changes.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The New York Times