FAA Expands AI Traffic Tool Nationwide After Groundstop Sparks Safety Debate

The FAA is deploying its $875 million AI system, SMART, across all 22 national air traffic control centers. While the agency claims the tool reduces delays and fuel use, the rollout follows a national groundstop and faces criticism from unions and lawmakers over safety and exclusion from the design process.
Key points
- The FAA announced the nationwide expansion of SMART, an AI tool designed to optimize flight routes and reduce congestion, following a successful pilot in Washington, D.C. airspace.
- The system has reportedly rerouted 180 flights, saving an average of 10 minutes and 80 gallons of fuel per flight, according to FAA statements.
- A national groundstop on November 13, 2026, caused widespread flight cancellations, leading officials to investigate potential links to SMART or other communication failures.
- The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) stated it was not involved in the design, testing, or implementation of SMART, raising concerns about workforce impact.
- Democratic lawmakers have requested a review by the Government Accountability Office, citing fears that the AI could 'hallucinate' safety-critical information or interfere with human decision-making.
Background
The FAA has been modernizing its air traffic management infrastructure for years, including the NextGen system and the recent deployment of SMART. This follows a period of increased scrutiny on aviation safety, including a fatal Amazon cargo crash in September 2026 and a Learjet crash in November 2026. The current rollout occurs against a backdrop of chronic air traffic controller shortages and debates over the role of automation in aviation.
How outlets are covering it
The FAA and airline executives, such as Delta and American Airlines CEOs, support SMART as a tool to improve efficiency and reduce delays. In contrast, the NATCA union and Democratic lawmakers criticize the lack of union involvement and potential safety risks. Some industry experts, like Mary Schiavo and Michael McCormick, acknowledge the benefits of predictive AI but warn about the need for rigorous testing and reliability in safety-critical environments. The Atlantic notes the uncertainty surrounding the cause of the recent groundstop, while Wired highlights broader concerns about AI integration in aviation.
Why it matters
The expansion of SMART represents a significant shift in how the FAA manages air traffic, potentially reducing delays and fuel consumption. However, the controversy highlights the tension between technological innovation and safety, as well as the importance of stakeholder involvement in critical infrastructure decisions. The outcome of this rollout could set precedents for AI use in other high-stakes industries.
What to watch
The FAA will continue to monitor the performance of SMART across all 22 centers. The Government Accountability Office may conduct a review as requested by lawmakers. The industry will watch for any further incidents or safety issues related to the system. The FAA may also adjust its staffing targets for air traffic controllers based on the efficiency gains from SMART.
- No Pilots. Few Air Traffic Controllers. What Could Go Wrong? WIRED
- FAA expands AI advice to manage air traffic congestion across entire US airspace Ars Technica
- The Next Major Grounding Will Be Worse The Atlantic
- AI company behind FAA’s SMART tool denies link to ground stop, Duffy confirms The Hill
- The FAA Is Rolling Out Its AI Air Traffic Tool Nationwide Gizmodo
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on WIRED