US Export Controls Face Scrutiny as Empty Chinese Firms Cleared for Nvidia Chips

Investigations reveal that the US Commerce Department has approved Chinese firms with empty offices and ties to sanctioned entities to purchase Nvidia H200 AI chips. While Nvidia tightens tracking in Southeast Asia to prevent smuggling, CEO Jensen Huang opposes total export bans, arguing that US competitiveness requires global market participation despite security risks.
Key points
- The New York Times reports that New Matrix and Maginfra, two Chinese firms approved to buy Nvidia H200 chips, have empty offices and no verifiable physical presence.
- New Matrix’s owners are linked to Wise Road, a private equity firm blacklisted by the US since 2024 for aiding Beijing in acquiring sensitive chip technology.
- Maginfra is suspected of being linked to Inspur, a company blacklisted by Washington in 2023 for supporting the People’s Liberation Army.
- Nvidia is requiring Southeast Asian buyers to join its fleet intelligence tracking system to maintain Cloud Partner status, aiming to prevent restricted hardware from reaching China via intermediaries.
- Jensen Huang rejected calls for a total China chip ban, stating that US companies must compete globally and that the US is several years ahead of China in AI technology.
Background
This development follows a period of volatility in chip stocks and heightened scrutiny of US-China tech ties. In late 2026, concerns over Chinese competition and potential espionage have driven bipartisan pressure for stricter export controls. Previously, the Trump administration relaxed chip export limits after Nvidia agreed to pay a 15% cut of sales to the government, leading to the approval of roughly two dozen Chinese firms for H200 purchases.
How outlets are covering it
The Verge and Tom’s Hardware emphasize the failure of due diligence, citing the New York Times investigation that highlights empty offices and links to sanctioned entities. They suggest the Commerce Department may be rubber-stamping applications. Yahoo Finance focuses on Nvidia’s proactive measures, such as mandatory tracking in Southeast Asia, to preempt stricter government regulations. Wccftech highlights the ideological divide, contrasting Nvidia’s CEO’s pro-competition stance with Anthropic’s CEO’s call for a total ban, noting that while the US leads in technology, smuggling networks remain a persistent risk.
Why it matters
The approval of non-existent or sanctioned-linked firms undermines the credibility of US export controls and raises national security concerns. If smuggling networks continue to bypass restrictions, it could justify harsher trade restrictions that harm legitimate US businesses. Conversely, the lack of strict enforcement may allow China to acquire advanced AI capabilities, narrowing the technological gap between the US and Beijing.
What to watch
Regulators may face increased pressure to tighten vetting processes for Chinese buyers. Nvidia could face further scrutiny if more smuggling cases emerge, potentially leading to stricter export rules. The debate between total bans and competitive engagement will likely continue, influencing future trade policies and corporate strategies in the AI sector.
- The US let Nvidia sell chips to an empty office in China The Verge
- U.S. Cleared Nvidia Chips to Chinese Firms With Empty Offices and Troubling Ties The New York Times
- Nvidia's Quiet New Ultimatum to Stop China Chip Smuggling Yahoo Finance
- Two Chinese companies cleared to buy banned Nvidia AI chips have empty offices and unknown addresses — investigation reveals businesses have ties to sanctioned Chinese military suppliers Tom's Hardware
- NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang Rejects Anthropic’s Total China Chip Ban Push, Says “I Completely Disagree” And Believes “America Is About Competition” Wccftech
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Verge