AI Fakes Citations in Biomedical Papers, Troubling Clinical Guidelines
TL;DR Summary
An audit of millions of biomedical papers found more than 4,000 citations to non-existent or misattributed studies, many generated by AI, across nearly 3,000 papers; the number has grown 12-fold in three years and could skew clinical guidelines unless researchers and editors rigorously fact-check AI-assisted citations.
Topics:health#artificial-intelligence#biomedical-research#citations#clinical-guidelines#fake-references#technology
- AI is fabricating citations in biomedical studies, researchers find CBS News
- One in 277 PubMed-indexed papers in 2026 shows fabricated references, says analysis Retraction Watch
- Fraudulent citations, blamed on AI hallucinations, are becoming more common in research papers statnews.com
- Thousands of medical papers found citing studies that never existed: Report | Study raised concerns over growing use of AI | Inshorts Inshorts
- C. Jillian Tsai: The Lancet Report on Fake Citations and Paper Mills in Scientific Publishing Oncodaily
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
4
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
93%
646 → 46 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CBS News