
Paper mills inflate cancer research metrics by doubling citations
A large analysis of 33,159 papers across 20 high‑impact molecular-oncology journals finds papers likely produced by paper mills receive about twice as many citations as genuine papers, often citing other suspect papers and inflating journal impact factors. Using a BERT-based detector on bioscience articles, 12.3% of papers were flagged; Nature Cancer had none; patterns suggest coordinated manipulation and risks for publishers, though some false positives may exist.













