Forensic data and autopsy results challenge Mississippi grand jury's drowning conclusion in Nolan Wells case

3 min read
Source: The Guardian
Forensic data and autopsy results challenge Mississippi grand jury's drowning conclusion in Nolan Wells case
Photo: The Guardian
TL;DR

Civil rights attorney Ben Crump and forensic expert Andrew Garrett released new evidence on Thursday regarding the death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells, contradicting a recent Mississippi grand jury decision. The state autopsy found no water in Wells’s lungs or stomach, while phone forensics confirmed that data was deleted after his last use on July 4. Although the grand jury ruled the death consistent with accidental drowning, the family’s legal team argues these findings suggest foul play and are calling for federal intervention.

Key points

  • State autopsy found no water in Wells’s airways or stomach, contradicting the grand jury’s drowning conclusion.
  • Forensic expert Andrew Garrett confirmed that Snapchat data was deleted from Wells’s phone after his last access at 2:18 p.m.
  • Both state and independent autopsies listed the cause and manner of death as undetermined, noting fresh bruising on Wells’s head.
  • The family’s legal team is demanding federal oversight and transparency regarding the grand jury’s investigative materials.
  • Jackson County District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath maintains the grand jury’s no true bill was thorough and accurate.

Background

Nolan Wells, an 18-year-old Black college student, disappeared after a July 4 boat trip to Horn Island in Mississippi. His body was recovered two days later. A Jackson County grand jury recently returned a no true bill, finding no evidence of criminal conduct. This development follows earlier coverage of the family’s dispute with local authorities over the release of autopsy reports and phone forensics.

How outlets are covering it

The Guardian and WLOX emphasize the forensic contradictions, highlighting the absence of water in Wells’s lungs and the deletion of phone data as evidence against the drowning theory. Cleveland 19 News focuses on the technical details of the phone extraction, noting that 90% of Wells’s communication was via Snapchat and Instagram. In contrast, Jackson County District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath defends the grand jury’s findings, arguing that the family withheld evidence and that the activity described on the phone was from other users, not physical access by Wells. The family’s legal team, represented by Ben Crump and Liza Park, argues that the lack of water in the lungs and the fresh bruising on Wells’s head indicate foul play, while local officials and some of Wells’s friends hope the grand jury report will quell public speculation.

Why it matters

The case has sparked national debate over race and justice in Mississippi, with the family’s legal team calling for federal oversight due to perceived inconsistencies in the local investigation. The release of forensic data and autopsy results has intensified the dispute between the family and local authorities, highlighting broader issues of transparency and accountability in criminal investigations.

What to watch

The family’s legal team plans to hold a press conference with Dr. Roger Mitchell, who conducted the independent autopsy, to discuss findings from both reports. They are also calling for federal authorities to investigate the events surrounding Wells’s death. The Jackson County District Attorney’s office maintains its position and is likely to continue defending the grand jury’s decision.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on The Guardian