NYT Engineer Shot by In-Laws Amid Bitter Custody Dispute

3 min read
Source: New York Post
NYT Engineer Shot by In-Laws Amid Bitter Custody Dispute
Photo: New York Post
TL;DR

Jonathan McKinsey, a 40-year-old engineering executive at The New York Times, was fatally shot on Saturday in a Dublin, California, parking lot. His in-laws, Shouyong Zhang and Shili Chen, both 77, were arrested nearby and charged with first-degree murder. Court records reveal a volatile history between McKinsey and his wife, Candice Jang, including dueling restraining orders and allegations of domestic abuse. McKinsey had recently sought unsupervised custody of their three children, a request Jang opposed due to alleged child abuse. The shooting occurred amid a bitter divorce and custody battle, with no official motive yet confirmed by police.

Key points

  • McKinsey was found dead with multiple gunshot wounds at Dublin Sports Grounds around 3 p.m. on Saturday.
  • Zhang and Chen were arrested shortly after the shooting and are held without bail at Santa Rita Jail.
  • The couple faces charges including first-degree murder, felony conspiracy, and child endangerment.
  • McKinsey and Jang had competing restraining orders and were in the middle of a custody dispute over their three children.
  • McKinsey had recently been granted unsupervised visitation rights, which Jang opposed due to alleged abuse.

Background

The shooting occurred against the backdrop of a high-profile custody dispute. McKinsey, who transitioned from female to male in 2010, had filed for divorce in December 2025. He alleged years of abuse by Jang, including physical violence and emotional degradation. Jang, in turn, accused McKinsey of child abuse and domestic violence, leading to his misdemeanor charges. The couple’s relationship had deteriorated significantly, with both filing restraining orders against each other. The shooting took place in a suburban Bay Area community, highlighting the tragic intersection of family conflict and violence.

How outlets are covering it

The New York Post emphasized the alleged motive related to McKinsey’s son wearing his sister’s dresses, citing court documents where Chen used slurs against the child and McKinsey. The Mercury News focused on the broader custody dispute and the competing allegations of abuse, noting that police have not confirmed a motive. KTVU highlighted the legal complexities, including the recent grant of unsupervised visitation to McKinsey, and the potential for voluntary manslaughter charges if the grandparents’ actions are deemed reasonable under the circumstances. The New York Times provided a factual overview, confirming McKinsey’s role at the newspaper and the basic facts of the shooting.

Why it matters

This case underscores the severe consequences of unresolved family disputes and the potential for violence in custody battles. It also highlights the challenges faced by transgender individuals in legal and personal contexts, as McKinsey’s transition and his son’s gender expression were central to the alleged conflict. The case may have implications for how courts handle custody disputes involving allegations of abuse and the role of extended family in such conflicts.

What to watch

Zhang and Chen are scheduled to be arraigned in Alameda County Superior Court on Wednesday. Prosecutors will review the case to determine the appropriate charges, potentially including voluntary manslaughter if the grandparents’ actions are deemed reasonable. The custody dispute between McKinsey and Jang will likely continue, with Jang retaining sole legal and physical custody of the children. The New York Times has not commented on the incident, and McKinsey’s family has expressed their grief and trust in the justice system.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on New York Post