Court fight over Medicaid work rules hinges on who’s too sick to work
Democratic attorneys general and the Justice Department are challenging a Trump-era rule that would require Medicaid expansion adults to work 80 hours a month, arguing that a cancer diagnosis or other illnesses aren’t enough to exempt someone and that the rule is too vague on how to judge medical frailty. The Boston court ruling could determine who must work, volunteer, or study to keep coverage and how states verify exemptions, amid a rocky rollout (notably Nebraska) and concerns about administrative burden. The policy aims to curb costs ahead of the 2027-2028 rollout and becomes a focal point in the broader political fight over Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.
- A cancer diagnosis may not be enough: Trump and Democratic states clash in court over who’s too sick to work Politico
- What to know about Medicaid work requirements coming to Ohio Signal Cleveland
- Idahoans who are ‘medically frail’ are exempt from Medicaid work requirements. How do you prove it? Idaho Capital Sun
- What’s Changing With Medicaid In 2026? Propel
- New Work Rules Could Drop Thousands of Sick N.C. Residents From Medicaid The Assembly NC
Reading Insights
1
4
13 min
vs 14 min read
96%
2,703 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Politico