Beatty seeks court block on adding Trump's name to Kennedy Center
Representative Joyce Beatty has asked a federal court to stop the Kennedy Center from reinstating Trump’s name on one of its buildings, signaling a legal challenge over the renaming.*
Tag
Court Case
All articles tagged with #court case
Court fight over Medicaid work rules hinges on who’s too sick to work
Democratic attorneys general and the Justice Department are challenging a Trump-era rule that would require Medicaid expansion adults to work 80 hours a month, arguing that a cancer diagnosis or other illnesses aren’t enough to exempt someone and that the rule is too vague on how to judge medical frailty. The Boston court ruling could determine who must work, volunteer, or study to keep coverage and how states verify exemptions, amid a rocky rollout (notably Nebraska) and concerns about administrative burden. The policy aims to curb costs ahead of the 2027-2028 rollout and becomes a focal point in the broader political fight over Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.
Scottsdale Lottery Showdown: Who Gets the $12.8M Prize?
A Circle K store manager in Scottsdale was fired after buying a winning lottery ticket left behind by a customer, a prize now valued at about $12.8 million. Circle K corporate says the ticket belongs to the company, while the former employee contends he followed policy and even offered to share the winnings with a coworker. A legal battle is expected as a judge decides who owns the prize, with the money currently held by the lottery office.
Nintendo’s Palworld Patent Bid Narrowed to Obsolete Versions, Likely Tiny Damages
As an October 1 evidentiary hearing looms, Nintendo’s patent suit against Pocketpair over Palworld has been narrowed to older Palworld versions, with virtually no path to winning against current or upcoming releases; even if Nintendo were successful on the old-version claims, damages would max at about 5 million JPY (~$30,000), a fraction of litigation costs. The development signals limited impact on Palworld 1.0’s launch and highlights the broader challenge of securing game-rule patents in key jurisdictions, potentially dampening future patent-enforcement efforts in the industry.
Musk v. Altman: The Statute of Limitations Trial that Revealed More Feuds Than Facts
Verge reporter Liz Lopatto analyzes the Musk v. Altman trial, where the jury ruled Musk filed too late to prosecute the charitable‑trust claim. The case largely turned on personal vendettas, leadership dynamics in OpenAI, and industry intrigue, with Microsoft playing a stabilizing role behind the scenes. The trial exposed immaturity in AI leadership and questions about Grok’s effectiveness, but it’s unlikely to derail OpenAI in the near term; expect appeals and continued industry scrutiny as the saga drags on.
No Said No, He Struck: A Domestic Assault Case and Mother's Defense
A woman reportedly told a man no and tried to walk away, but he allegedly stomped on her head. The incident has sparked controversy after the accused’s mother described the woman as the bully, illustrating broader tensions around domestic violence and how families respond when someone is harmed.
Lawyers urge court to halt Trump's plan to tighten voter lists and curb mail ballots
Lawyers have asked a judge to block Donald Trump’s order that would create an eligible voter list and restrict mail ballots, arguing the move would suppress voting access and raise constitutional concerns.
Altman Takes Stand as OpenAI Battles Musk in High-Stakes Courtroom Showdown
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testified in a lawsuit brought by Elon Musk, defending the company against claims that restructuring into a for-profit entity violated its nonprofit mandate; Altman argued Musk sought control and emphasized that the nonprofit still oversees the for-profit arm, with the case potentially shaping OpenAI’s path to a public listing.
OpenAI Trial: Musk and Altman Under Scrutiny as Leadership Stories Unfold
In a high-profile Oakland trial, Elon Musk and Sam Altman reveal contrasting leadership styles and personal details: Musk portrays OpenAI's funding as a safety-focused counterweight to Google and warns of AI risks, while former OpenAI insiders label Altman’s tenure chaotic and evasive, contributing to his 2023 ouster. The proceedings also touch on Musk’s personal ties to Shivon Zilis (including a sperm-donor arrangement) and on OpenAI’s governance moves, such as Greg Brockman’s large stake and the company’s IPO prospects amid scrutiny of Altman’s outside investments.
Meta Could Pull Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp From New Mexico Over Child-Safety Demands
In the remedies phase of New Mexico's landmark child-safety suit, Meta says the state’s proposed reforms—age verification, safer algorithms and safeguards, warnings, and court oversight—could lead to a withdrawal of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp from the state, arguing many measures are technologically infeasible while the state pursues a court-ordered fix.
Musk vs Altman: The Court Battle Over OpenAI’s Nonprofit Roots
Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and its leaders, including Sam Altman, moves to trial over Musk’s claim that OpenAI’s 2019 shift from nonprofit to for‑profit violated its charitable mission and unjustly enriched its executives; OpenAI counters that Musk left for personal reasons and argues the for‑profit structure was justified. Microsoft is named as a co-defendant. The case tests whether a company built for public good can evolve into a profit‑driven entity, with potential implications for OpenAI’s governance and Musk’s own xAI. Jury selection will be unusually broad to ensure impartiality given the defendants’ celebrity status, with witnesses from Nadella to former OpenAI executives; the jury will advise on liability while the judge handles remedies, and deliberations are expected around May 12, 2026.
Rebel Wilson defamation case: court hears allegations labeled 'malicious concoctions'
In a Sydney defamation trial, Rebel Wilson’s posts accusing a young actress of being harassed by a producer are described by the opposing side as 'malicious concoctions.' The case centers on whether the actress, Charlotte MacInnes, told Wilson about the bath incident with producer Amanda Ghost and whether the posts damaged MacInnes’ reputation; MacInnes denies making a complaint, while Wilson’s team says she lied to further her career. Private texts and emails shown in court discuss the incident and the alleged leverage used in contract negotiations. The nine‑day trial continues.
Sentebale sues its co-founder Prince Harry for defamation in court
Sentebale, the Botswana- and Lesotho-focused charity co-founded by Prince Harry, is suing him for defamation in a case filed March 24, with Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer listed as defendants in a libel and slander claim. The dispute follows Harry’s departure from the charity amid a clash with chair Sophie Chandauka; a Charity Commission inquiry criticized how the public dispute was handled and said it harmed the charity, and no further documents were released alongside the filing.
High Court weighs ending migrant protections
The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a push to end protections for certain migrants, a move that could significantly reshape immigration policy and impact people currently shielded by existing laws.
Anthropic Faces Potential $5B Hit as Pentagon Dispute Intensifies
Anthropic warned that its feud with the Pentagon could cost up to $5 billion in revenue as negotiations over guardrails for AI use stall Pentagon contracts. OpenAI and Google researchers filed an amicus brief supporting Anthropic, arguing the Pentagon’s “supply-chain risk” designation could hurt the broader US AI industry. Anthropic is seeking a temporary court order to continue Pentagon-related work while lawsuits challenge the designation and its First Amendment claims. Some customers have paused talks or demanded escape clauses, but major cloud providers will continue offering Claude without Pentagon ties; a San Francisco hearing could happen soon.