Supreme Court Case Puts Domestic Violence and Gun Rights at Crossroads

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether people under domestic violence protection orders should lose access to their guns, a decision that could have significant implications for how police and courts handle domestic violence cases. Advocates argue that gun restrictions tied to such orders are crucial for protecting victims, as women are five times more likely to be killed in domestic violence incidents when the abuser has access to a gun. Gun rights groups argue that taking firearms away from those under protection orders violates the Second Amendment. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of gun rights supporters, states would have fewer options to prevent domestic abusers from possessing firearms, potentially leading to more deaths.
- U.S. v. Rahimi: Guns Rights and Domestic Violence Converge in Latest Supreme Court Case ProPublica
- Shot 5 times, domestic abuse survivor implores Supreme Court to uphold gun ban ABC News
- Will Domestic Violence Perpetrators Get to Carry Guns? The American Prospect
- U.S. v. Rahimi: Delaware should not allow abuse offenders to own guns The News Journal
- U.S. v. Rahimi important for domestic violence victims South Bend Tribune
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
10
10 min
vs 11 min read
94%
2,033 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on ProPublica