"Preparing Lawyers for Supreme Court Arguments and Word-Count Limits"

TL;DR
Lawyers Jason Murray and Jonathan Mitchell are preparing to argue in the Supreme Court case to keep Donald Trump off presidential ballots, with Murray having never argued before the justices and Mitchell having limited experience in a case of this magnitude. Both lawyers are engaging in multiple moot courts to refine their arguments, as they face the challenge of anticipating hypothetical questions from the justices. The case involves multiple constitutional issues and the aftermath of the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, and the lawyers' every word will be closely scrutinized as the session will be carried live by many media outlets.
Topics:nationlaw-and-politics#constitutional-issues#donald-trump#law-and-politics#lawyers#moot-courts#supreme-court
- How lawyers in the Trump ballot case are training for the Supreme Court arguments CNN
- Supreme Court word-count limits for lawyers, explained in 1,026 words The Conversation
- Supreme Court word-count limits for lawyers—explained in 1026 words University of Colorado Boulder
- Supreme Court word-count limits for lawyers, explained in 1026 words The Caledonian-Record
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on CNN