Equity, Not Merits, Should Drive the USPS Stay Decision for 2026 Ballots

TL;DR Summary
Legal analyst Marty Lederman argues the Supreme Court should deny the government’s stay of the USPS Final Rule for the 2026 election, focusing on the balance of equities rather than resolving the merits. The Rule’s nine preconditions could delay or prevent ballot delivery and disenfranchise voters in many jurisdictions, while the government offers little evidence of irreparable harm, making denial the straightforward equitable outcome. He also notes that even if the Rule might be ultra vires on merits, the equities alone justify keeping the injunction in place for the 2026 election, consistent with precedents like California and Winter.
- The Simplest Way for the Supreme Court to Rule in the USPS Mail Ballots Case Just Security
- Trump’s Mail Voting Plan Is Coming to a Head. Here’s What to Know. The New York Times
- Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mail ballot restrictions to move forward for a third time NBC News
- Midterm mail ballots start to go to voters as litigation over Trump’s order creates uncertainty apnews.com
- Former GOP lawmakers join Democrats to challenge Trump’s mail-in voting crackdown ms.now
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
26 min
vs 27 min read
Condensed
98%
5,383 → 98 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Just Security