All articles tagged with #law
Parents of a Ukrainian journalist killed in a 2022 Russian strike are suing Fox News and reporter Benjamin Hall, alleging the network ignored security warnings. A new investigation details how the team traveled beyond Kyiv despite safety vetoes. Fox denies the claims, calling them inaccurate, while legal proceedings continue in New York and the UK.
San Francisco filed a state-court complaint seeking to block Truth Social from offering high-priced subscribers early access to posts by the president and other officials, arguing the paid “Truth API” creates market-moving, unfair advantages and could amount to insider trading under California law; the city seeks an injunction and penalties, noting past posts that allegedly moved stocks and pre-release employment data, with a related federal case on Truth API continuing.
A group of 53 former federal prosecutors filed an amicus brief arguing that Trump Media & Technology Group's Truth API, which charges Wall Street subscribers for real-time access to posts, likely violates federal securities laws and other criminal statutes, potentially implicating insider trading and public-corruption provisions; a federal lawsuit seeks to block the service with a hearing set for Oct. 7 in Manhattan.
Logan Brown recounts being billed $600 per hour for data-entry tasks at a Harvard-educated law firm and argues that AI is reshaping the legal industry by enabling tech-driven firms and democratizing access to high-quality legal services, a shift that could shrink BigLaw’s dominance while expanding opportunities for both clients and young lawyers.
Two California lawsuits target Nazi‑looted artworks still on display: the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena is faced with returning Lucas Cranach the Elder’s Adam and Eve, and Gottliebova Babbitt heirs seek the return of watercolors she painted in Auschwitz under orders from Mengele. The actions come after California’s AB 2867 and the federal Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025, which expand heirs’ ability to pursue recovery in court. Museums insist they hold valid title and will keep the works on view, while advocates say recovering the art could fund support for Holocaust survivors; Auschwitz Memorial contends the watercolors are essential historical documents and should remain. The cases will test how new laws affect ownership disputes over Nazi‑looted art.
Jewish heirs have filed two lawsuits—one in California against the Norton Simon Museum for a Cranach painting and another in federal court over watercolors painted by a Auschwitz prisoner—seeking return of Nazi-looted works. The push follows California AB 2867 and the federal Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025, which expand avenues to recover art seized during the Holocaust, even as museums maintain title and public display. The cases underscore the emotionally charged, ongoing struggle to restore ownership to survivors and their families.
Federal judges have overwhelmingly blocked ICE’s plan to detain tens of thousands without bond, with roughly 460 district judges ruling against it and nine of 11 federal circuits siding against the policy; only a small number of Republican-appointed appellate judges dissented. The administration argues the 1996 law allows mass detention of anyone in the U.S. without permission, while opponents say the move distorts the statute and tramples due process. As the case moves to the Supreme Court, observers note a divergence among lower courts and warn the Court could either uphold a sweeping policy or check it, potentially reshaping detention practices for years to come.
A Tennessee woman, Angela Lipps, sues the city of Fargo and a detective for $10 million after an AI facial-recognition misidentification led to her wrongful arrest and detention on bank-theft charges that were later dropped; she alleges lack of policy and training in the police use of facial recognition and seeks accountability for the trauma and losses she suffered.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan warned the DOJ could face civil contempt if it fails to comply with a renewed order on Epstein Files Transparency Act disclosures, upholding some redactions while requiring more documentation for in‑camera review; the ruling highlights ongoing scrutiny of DOJ file releases amid a House push for Act II.
New Hampshire Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald resigned after a Judicial Conduct Committee settlement found he violated the code in handling a $50,000 payout to a close colleague, bypassing merit-based procedures and showing favoritism. He admitted the violations, agreed to resign effective immediately, and will pay the JCC’s legal fees. Four associate justices will handle his administrative duties as Ayotte’s office confirmed the resignation.
The victim in the Josh Jacobs battery case, the player’s former girlfriend, has filed a motion to permanently seal the video evidence, joining Jacobs’s prior bid to keep materials private. The NFL is seeking access to the footage and exploring legal maneuvers to obtain it; if the league opposes the seal and gains access, Jacobs could face delays in the disciplinary process and remain on paid leave until the video is reviewed.
New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald resigned after the Judicial Conduct Committee found he violated the Code of Judicial Conduct in actions related to the layoff and rehiring of an employee, bypassing procedures and failing to ensure impartial administrative appointments. He took responsibility and said resignation would help preserve the court’s integrity; Gov. Ayotte accepted the resignation effective immediately. Four associate justices have taken over Chief Justice duties during his medical leave, with the court awaiting Sept. 22 oral arguments.
Arizona filed the first state-level suit accusing L’Oréal of concealing evidence that hair relaxers could cause ovarian and uterine cancers, alleging deceptive marketing to African American women and violations of consumer-protection laws; the state seeks penalties, damages, and warnings, while more than 12,000 related lawsuits are consolidated in a Chicago MDL that could reach trials as early as 2027.
Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey have applied to Wisconsin’s governor’s commutation advisory board for clemency in the 2005 Theresa Halbach murder; Avery’s county-initiated request must be approved by a judge before moving to the state board, while Dassey’s juvenile commutation was forwarded to the state after a judge’s review. The board is slated to meet again next week after hearing 12 cases last month.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court publicly reprimanded District Court Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph for creating an appearance of impropriety by ordering the courtroom audio system shut off during a sidebar about a plan to release an immigrant to a courthouse lockup to evade ICE; the court found she neither explicitly nor implicitly approved the plan and was unaware of the attorney's scheme, though a hearing officer had recommended discipline following the investigation into the 2018–2019 case. Joseph remains on administrative duties after prior federal proceedings related to the case.