Texas court hearing reveals worsening condition of newborn in surrogacy dispute
A California couple and their surrogate faced off in a Dallas court over a newborn with a life-threatening heart defect, with the child’s condition deteriorating after birth. The couple, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, argued they are the child’s parents and expressed anguish over the surrogate’s attempts to deny them rights, citing a previous request for an abortion. Surrogate McKenna West, a nurse from Alaska, sought sole conservatorship to make medical decisions, claiming the couple was not committed to ensuring the child received necessary surgeries. The court did not issue a final ruling on custody or conservatorship, leaving a restraining order in place. The dispute highlights tensions between surrogacy contracts, parental rights, and abortion politics, with the child suffering from hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a condition that can be fatal without treatment.
Key points
- The newborn, named Rumi by the couple and Gabriel by the surrogate, has hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a congenital defect affecting fewer than 1,000 newborns annually.
- The couple’s attorney reported the child’s condition has worsened significantly, with no blood flow to the left side of the heart and complications from a post-birth procedure.
- Surrogate McKenna West stated she would drop custody claims if the court confirmed the couple’s commitment to the child’s surgeries.
- The couple alleged West violated their 2025 surrogacy contract, while West argued the couple’s prior request for an abortion demonstrated a lack of commitment to the child’s care.
- The court left the restraining order in effect, barring West from seeing or holding the child, but did not rule on final custody or conservatorship.
Background
This dispute emerged after the couple, who had undergone eight rounds of IVF and a hysterectomy, entered a surrogacy contract in August 2025. West, a nurse, traveled from Alaska to Texas to give birth in August 2022, amid a diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. The case has drawn national attention to the intersection of surrogacy, abortion, and medical decision-making, with right-to-life groups and GOP officeholders supporting West. Earlier hearings in Dallas focused on whether the couple would guarantee life-saving care for the child, with the court ordering life-sustaining treatment in August 2022.
Why it matters
The case underscores the legal and ethical complexities of surrogacy, particularly when prenatal diagnoses lead to disputes over parental rights and medical decisions. It highlights gaps in federal surrogacy regulation and the potential for conflicting state laws to create ambiguity in custody and care. The dispute also reflects broader political tensions between abortion rights and right-to-life advocates, with the child’s critical condition adding urgency to the legal battle.
What to watch
The court is expected to issue a ruling on custody and conservatorship in the coming weeks, potentially determining whether the couple or West will have authority over the child’s medical care. The outcome may set a precedent for surrogacy disputes involving prenatal diagnoses and the role of parental rights in cases where abortion was previously requested.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on NBC News