Tina Peters Rejects Shasta County Election Role Amid Statewide Backlash
Tina Peters, a former Colorado elections clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines, has declined a consultant position offered by Shasta County, California. The offer by registrar Clint Curtis sparked intense opposition from Governor Gavin Newsom, who directed state corrections officials to block Peters' parole transfer into California. Peters' attorney cited her national campaign schedule as the reason for the refusal, while Curtis claimed she was too busy with other election work. The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between election denialists and state authorities over the integrity of the 2026 electoral process.
Key points
- Tina Peters declined a job offer from Shasta County Registrar of Voters Clint Curtis to assist with the November election.
- Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the offer as a 'disgrace' and directed the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation to block Peters' parole transfer.
- Peters was convicted in 2024 for allowing unauthorized access to Mesa County voting equipment in 2021, a crime linked to the MyPillow founder Mike Lindell.
- Curtis, who lost his primary in June, claimed Peters was too busy with national election work to accept the role, while her attorney cited similar reasons.
- Shasta County officials and some supervisors criticized the hiring attempt, noting it bypassed standard onboarding processes and occurred while Curtis was a 'lame duck' official.
Background
This incident follows earlier reports in August 2026 that Peters was set to become an assistant registrar in Shasta County, a move that raised concerns about election integrity in a deep-red county. The controversy is part of a broader pattern of election-denial narratives influencing local and state politics, as seen in Arizona GOP primaries and other recent political developments.
How outlets are covering it
The Los Angeles Times and Record Searchlight report that Peters declined the offer due to her busy schedule, with Curtis citing her national election work. KRCR and Yahoo emphasize Newsom's active efforts to block her parole transfer, framing the issue as a state-level intervention. The Los Angeles Times highlights Curtis' defiance and his criticism of Newsom, while the Record Searchlight notes the financial imprudence of the hiring plan given Curtis' impending departure from office. All sources agree on the core facts but differ in emphasis: some focus on the political backlash, while others focus on the logistical and legal hurdles.
Why it matters
The rejection of Peters' job offer underscores the high stakes of election integrity in the 2026 cycle. It demonstrates the growing resistance to election denialists in key states like California and the potential for state-level interventions to prevent compromised officials from influencing elections. The incident also highlights the tensions between local and state authorities over the appointment of election officials with controversial backgrounds.
What to watch
Newsom's office will continue to monitor Peters' parole status to ensure she does not transfer to California. Shasta County will proceed with the November election without Peters' involvement, and Curtis will leave office in January 2027. The controversy may influence future hiring practices and oversight of election officials in other jurisdictions.
- Convicted MAGA election denier declines job in California amid pressure from Newsom Los Angeles Times
- Newsom seeks to block Tina Peters parole transfer over Shasta County elections job KRCR
- Tina Peters turns down job with California county’s registrar of voters Yahoo
- Tina Peters declines Shasta County role after political uproar: UPDATE Record Searchlight
- Tina Peters, through attorney, backs off formal role in Shasta County elections cyberscoop.com
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Los Angeles Times