Supreme Court to review racial gerrymandering in South Carolina.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court will hear a case that could allow state lawmakers to draw gerrymandered maps with even more leeway than they already have. The case, Alexander v. South Carolina Conference of the NAACP, involves the question of whether state lawmakers may use race to identify Democratic voters and then draw district lines intended to diminish these voters' ability to elect a candidate of their choice. The case is both a racial gerrymandering case and a partisan gerrymandering case, and the Supreme Court's decision could have profound implications for voting rights throughout the nation.
Topics:nation#gerrymandering#partisan-politics#politics#racial-discrimination#supreme-court#voting-rights
- A new Supreme Court case threatens to make gerrymandering even worse, in Alexander v. NAACP Vox.com
- Supreme Court to review South Carolina congressional map for discrimination against Black voters WGN News
- Supreme Court agrees to take up South Carolina racial gerrymandering case CNN
- Supreme Court to weigh South Carolina plan that 'exiled' Black voters The Washington Post
- Supreme Court to hear racial redistricting case from South Carolina POLITICO
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
11
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
94%
1,624 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox.com