Nikki Hiltz reacts as Supreme Court upholds biology-based eligibility in girls’ sports

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that states may bar transgender student-athletes from girls’ sports by requiring competition based on biological sex at birth, a decision Nikki Hiltz—who identifies as transgender nonbinary—called disappointing but affirming that trans people belong in sport; the ruling, part of West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, could empower more states to enforce biology-based limits, even as 23 states lack such laws and some protections remain in others; Hiltz has discussed gender identity and recently won the Prefontaine Classic mile.
- American Olympic runner Nikki Hiltz, who identifies as transgender nonbinary, reacts to Supreme Court ruling Fox News
- “One of the worst days of my life:” SCOTUS ruling forces parents to break trans kids’ hearts Salon.com
- How the Supreme Court has changed on transgender rights since 2020 CNN
- Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win The Washington Post
- How the Tide Turned Against Transgender Athletes—and the Movement WSJ
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
9
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
91%
902 → 85 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News