Starbucks Denied Attempt to Dismiss Lawsuit Over Fruitless Refreshers Drinks

Starbucks' attempt to dismiss a consumer lawsuit regarding its Refresher drinks has been denied by a U.S. district court judge. The judge ruled that nine causes of action will remain active, while dropping two others. The lawsuit alleges that Starbucks engaged in false and deceptive practices by marketing the drinks with specific fruit names that do not accurately represent the ingredients. The judge suggested that the names and marketing could mislead consumers. Allegations of unjust enrichment and common law fraud will not proceed, but the plaintiffs have been given an opportunity to amend the fraud claim. Starbucks has defended its marketing and looks forward to defending itself against the claims.