CFP Confirms Ongoing ESPN Talks as 24-Team Bracket Previewed

The College Football Playoff (CFP) confirmed on October 15 that 'constructive discussions' with ESPN regarding a potential expansion to 24 teams are ongoing. While no final deal has been announced, On3 published a hypothetical 2026-27 bracket based on the current Week 7 AP Poll. In this projection, the top eight seeds receive first-round byes, while Boise State would secure the automatic Group of Six bid. The CFP emphasized its long-standing partnership with ESPN but declined to provide specific details on the new format or media rights.
Key points
- The CFP issued a statement on October 15 confirming continued 'constructive discussions' with ESPN about expanding the playoff to 24 teams.
- On3 projected a hypothetical 24-team bracket using the current Week 7 AP Poll, featuring 19 at-large teams and automatic bids for top Power Four and Group of Six champions.
- In the On3 projection, the top eight seeds (Georgia, Notre Dame, Miami, Ohio State, Indiana, Alabama, Texas, and BYU) receive first-round byes.
- Boise State, ranked No. 23, is projected to earn the automatic Group of Six bid in the hypothetical 2026-27 bracket.
- The CFP stated it will provide additional updates on future format and media rights 'when appropriate' but did not confirm a finalized agreement.
Background
The current 12-team CFP format was implemented three seasons ago, expanding from the previous four-team model. Recent bracket shifts have seen Georgia secure the top seed after defeating Alabama, while UCLA's playoff chances diminished following a season-ending injury to quarterback Nico Iamaleava. Notre Dame rose to the No. 4 seed after a dominant victory over Stanford. The ongoing negotiations with ESPN represent a significant shift from the current 12-team structure, which includes automatic bids for conference champions and at-large selections based on rankings.
How outlets are covering it
The CFP official statement focuses on the diplomatic aspect of the negotiations, highlighting the 'strong partnership' with ESPN and describing the dialogue as 'productive' without confirming a deal. In contrast, On3 provides a concrete, data-driven projection of what a 24-team bracket would look like based on current rankings, emphasizing the logistical implications such as home-field advantages for higher seeds and the inclusion of Group of Six champions. While the CFP remains cautious and non-committal, On3 treats the expansion as a likely reality for the 2027-28 season, illustrating the potential matchups and seeding dynamics.
Why it matters
A 24-team expansion would fundamentally alter the competitive landscape of college football, potentially increasing revenue and exposure for mid-major programs like Boise State. The outcome of the CFP-ESPN negotiations will determine the future structure of the sport's postseason, impacting scheduling, travel, and the financial distribution among participating institutions. The hypothetical bracket highlights how current rankings would translate into early-round matchups, offering a preview of the potential competitive balance under the new format.
What to watch
The CFP has indicated it will provide additional updates on the format and media rights 'when appropriate.' Fans and analysts will be watching for any official announcement regarding the 24-team expansion, which is expected to be implemented for the 2027-28 season. The current 12-team bracket will proceed as scheduled, with the first round games set for December 18-19, 2026, and the national championship in Las Vegas on January 25, 2027.
- 24-team College Football Playoff bracket seeded based on current AP Top 25 Poll On3
- Sources: College Football Playoff nearing deal for 24-team format in '27 ESPN
- Notre Dame reportedly plans to change its schedule due to 24-team playoff Yahoo Sports
- CFP Issues Update on Discussions with ESPN Connected to Potential Playoff Expansion to 24 Teams College Football Playoff
- What UNC Coach Bill Belichick Said About Reported CFP Expansion 247Sports
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on On3