HHS Workers Fear New Performance Reviews Are a Pretext for Pay Cuts and Layoffs
Federal employees at the Department of Health and Human Services are submitting mandatory 6,000-character self-assessments under a new performance review system, but many view the change with deep suspicion. Officials claim the updates aim to calibrate ratings and ensure consistency across agencies, yet staff fear the process is a tool to justify pay reductions or push out workers. This tension is heightened by the trauma of recent layoffs and departures during the DOGE era, leading to a widespread distrust of the administration's motives behind the new evaluation framework.
Key points
- HHS staff were ordered to submit 6,000-character self-assessments by Friday as part of a new performance review process.
- Administration officials state the changes are intended to calibrate employee rankings and promote consistent, credible ratings across agencies.
- Federal health workers are suspicious of the new system, fearing it will be used to reduce pay or force out employees.
- The tension is exacerbated by the trauma of DOGE-era layoffs and continued staff departures.
- The new review process has become a flashpoint in the ongoing conflict between HHS employees and the Trump administration.
Background
This development follows a period of significant workforce instability at federal health agencies, including the FDA and NIH, which have faced challenges in rebuilding their operations after the DOGE-era layoffs. The current performance review changes are part of a broader pattern of administrative actions that have heightened tensions between federal health workers and the Trump administration.
Why it matters
The new performance review system could have significant implications for the stability and morale of the federal health workforce. If the reviews are used to justify pay cuts or layoffs, it could further exacerbate the talent drain from critical agencies like the FDA and NIH, potentially impacting public health initiatives and regulatory oversight. The trust deficit between federal health workers and the administration could hinder effective governance and policy implementation.
What to watch
The outcome of the new performance review process will likely depend on how the administration uses the self-assessments and whether it follows through on any promised pay cuts or layoffs. Federal health workers may continue to resist the new system, potentially leading to further tensions and conflicts between the workforce and the administration. The long-term impact on the stability and effectiveness of federal health agencies will depend on how the administration navigates these challenges.
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on STAT