Tag

Research Evaluation

All articles tagged with #research evaluation

China’s spike in multiple corresponding authors tied to incentives, now curbed by reforms
policy2 months ago

China’s spike in multiple corresponding authors tied to incentives, now curbed by reforms

A Scientometrics analysis of about 1.75 million papers (2016–2020) found that roughly 30% of papers by Chinese authors had multiple corresponding authors in 2020, far above the global average, likely driven by an evaluation system that rewarded these roles for promotions and funding. Since 2020–2021, China has reformed incentives—ending cash rewards, clamping down on gift authorship, and requiring explicit author contributions—toward broader, contribution-based assessment, with reforms not intended to reduce international collaboration.

China ends its flagship journal ranking, prompting a rethink of scholarly merit
science-policy4 months ago

China ends its flagship journal ranking, prompting a rethink of scholarly merit

China’s National Science Library has stopped publishing the CAS Journal Partition Table, ending a 20+ year tool for evaluating journals and guiding hiring, funding, and promotions; a private group, Xinrui Scholar, has launched a new ranking using the same methodology, raising questions about independence and transparency and whether it will replace the CAS system or spur broader reform away from journal-based metrics, with early‑career researchers potentially bearing the brunt of the disruption.