Alaska Gas Venture Exposed as Sanctioned Russian Front

3 min read
Source: Yahoo News UK
Alaska Gas Venture Exposed as Sanctioned Russian Front
Photo: Yahoo News UK
TL;DR

A multibillion-dollar Alaskan natural gas project, Polar LNG, has been exposed as secretly funded and controlled by Novatek, a Russian energy giant under US sanctions. Former CEO Joel Riddle resigned after discovering that money attributed to UAE and US investors actually originated from Novatek. Despite legal warnings and regulatory hurdles, the project was discussed during US-Russia peace talks, with Trump’s envoys potentially trading sanctions relief for Russian technology.

Key points

  • Polar LNG, a US startup seeking to export Alaskan gas, received undisclosed funding from Novatek, a sanctioned Russian company.
  • Former CEO Joel Riddle resigned in September after learning the project was controlled by Novatek, not the UAE-based Tech Wave or US firm Gentry Beach as he was told.
  • Trump special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner discussed the project with Vladimir Putin during negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.
  • Novatek recently moved to acquire minority shareholder status in Polar LNG, potentially giving a sanctioned entity a stake in US gas production.
  • Trump waived sanctions on Novatek last week, overriding a law named after late Senator Lindsey Graham that specifically targeted the company.

Background

This development follows recent tensions over US-Russia energy deals. In late September, reports indicated Russia was demanding sanctions relief as part of an 'energy ceasefire' with Ukraine. Earlier in October, the Wall Street Journal criticized Trump for waiving Russian sanctions, calling it a betrayal of bipartisan legislation. Additionally, concerns have been raised that the US might be trading Ukrainian sovereignty for Russian cooperation in other geopolitical conflicts, such as the Iran crisis.

How outlets are covering it

The New York Times and Financial Times both report that Polar LNG’s leadership was misled about the source of funding, with Riddle believing the money came from UAE and US entities. However, the outlets differ on the current status: The New York Times notes that Witkoff and Kushner discussed the deal with Putin, framing it as a mix of war-ending and business-making, while the Financial Times highlights that almost the entire management team has left the company following the scandal. The New York Times emphasizes the legal violation and national security risk, whereas the Financial Times focuses on the internal collapse of the company’s leadership and the specific WhatsApp messages showing Novatek’s direct involvement.

Why it matters

The revelation exposes a potential breach of US sanctions and national security interests, as a sanctioned Russian entity seeks to control US Arctic gas production. It raises questions about the integrity of US-Russia peace negotiations, suggesting that economic deals may be prioritized over ending the war in Ukraine. The waiver of sanctions by the Trump administration further complicates US foreign policy and domestic legal frameworks.

What to watch

The US Treasury Department must decide whether to approve the use of Novatek technology in Alaska, despite existing sanctions. Polar LNG faces potential loss of licenses and regulatory approvals due to its ties to Novatek. Novatek’s move to acquire minority shareholder status may trigger further legal and political backlash. The outcome of US-Russia peace talks may be influenced by the resolution of this energy deal.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on Yahoo News UK