US Ambassador Warns of 'Devastating' Retaliation Over EU Spectrum Restrictions

US Ambassador Andrew Puzder warned that European firms face severe economic retaliation if the EU restricts satellite spectrum access for non-EU companies. The dispute centers on a European Commission proposal to reserve spectrum for local players, which would limit SpaceX’s Starlink operations. While Brussels aims to boost technological independence, Washington argues this harms competitiveness and risks degrading communications in Ukraine.
Key points
- US Ambassador Andrew Puzder stated that European companies would face 'devastating' retaliation from Washington if the EU proceeds with plans to restrict spectrum access for American rivals like SpaceX.
- The conflict arises from a European Commission proposal to reserve part of the radio spectrum used for direct satellite-to-smartphone connections for European companies, limiting access for US and Chinese firms.
- Puzder argued that legislation aimed at reducing US competitiveness is illegitimate, stating that Europe cannot enhance its own tech sector by weakening American competitors.
- SpaceX has criticized the proposal, warning it could degrade communication quality in Ukraine, where Starlink is critical for military and civilian use.
- The European Commission maintains its proposal is designed to diversify suppliers and incentivize market entry while remaining open to non-EU operators.
Background
This dispute follows a broader trend of EU efforts to reduce dependence on US technology, including the introduction of a Cloud and AI Development Act. It also coincides with tensions between Ukraine and the US regarding Starlink operations, where Ukrainian officials reported restrictions on military terminals in October 2026 amid friction between Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump.
How outlets are covering it
The Financial Times and Meduza both report on Puzder's warnings but emphasize different aspects. The FT highlights the broader regulatory context, including the EU's Digital Markets Act and Puzder's criticism of EU fines as revenue generation rather than competition policy. Meduza focuses more on the immediate threat to SpaceX and the potential impact on Ukraine's communications, noting SpaceX's sharp criticism of the proposal. Both sources agree on the core conflict but differ in their emphasis on the regulatory versus the strategic implications.
Why it matters
The dispute highlights growing tensions between the US and EU over technological sovereignty and market access. If the EU proceeds with its spectrum restrictions, it could trigger significant economic retaliation from Washington, potentially affecting trade relations and technological cooperation. Additionally, the restrictions could impact Ukraine's ability to maintain critical communications during the ongoing conflict, adding a geopolitical dimension to the regulatory dispute.
What to watch
The European Commission is expected to finalize its spectrum allocation proposal in the coming months. The US may escalate its response if the EU proceeds with the restrictions, potentially leading to trade disputes or further regulatory conflicts. SpaceX and other US tech companies may lobby against the proposal, while European firms may benefit from increased market access. The outcome will depend on the balance between EU technological sovereignty goals and US economic interests.
- US threatens Europe with ‘devastating’ retaliation if EU restricts SpaceX’s access to European market Meduza
- US threatens European companies over Starlink restrictions Financial Times
- AST SpaceMobile Advances Space-Based Cellular Broadband in Europe in Collaboration with European Mobile Network Operator Partners Business Wire
- European telecom groups mull bid for mobile satellite spectrum Reuters
- Europe’s Top Carriers Explore Satellite Group to Fend Off SpaceX Bloomberg.com
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on Meduza