SCOTUS narrows secondary liability for ISPs in music-piracy case

The Supreme Court ruled that Cox Communications cannot be held contributorily liable for copyright infringements by its customers, saying the service was not intended to enable infringement and that liability should not exceed prior jurisprudence. Justices Sotomayor and Jackson concurred in judgment but warned the ruling narrows liability inconsistent with precedent; their concurrence highlights procedural nuance. The decision reverses a 2024 Fourth Circuit ruling in Sony’s suit over pirated songs by Cox customers from 2013–2014, which sought over $1 billion in damages. Cox framed the ruling as a victory and the RIAA expressed disappointment, as the case progressed from district court to appellate court and finally to the Supreme Court, with oral arguments held previously. The ruling signals ISPs are not copyright police and should not be treated as arbiters of internet access based on speech.
- SCOTUS sides with Cox in landmark music piracy case Axios
- Supreme Court tosses $1B copyright verdict in record companies' battle over illegal internet downloads Fox Business
- Supreme Court says internet service provider isn’t liable for bootlegged music downloads CNN
- Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music The New York Times
- Supreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads The Hill
Reading Insights
0
15
1 min
vs 3 min read
68%
431 → 136 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Axios