Artists push back on AI training, scoring landmark wins and guardrails

A wave of lawsuits by authors, musicians and visual artists challenges AI systems trained on copyrighted works, arguing copyright infringement or terms-of-service violations. Notable developments include Andrea Bartz’s suit against Anthropic resulting in a $1.5 billion settlement and a ruling that using pirated ebooks for training can be fair use in certain contexts, ongoing cases against Meta, Google, Suno and others, and class actions from illustrators like Sarah Andersen. While plaintiffs see these cases as paving guardrails, many creators warn that the livelihoods of independent artists remain at risk as tech companies push for broad data-use rights through their platforms and terms of service.
- Artists are lawyering up against AI slop, and some are even winning The Verge
- Can a Copyright Risk Detector for AI-Created Media Protect Artists and Studios? | Exclusive TheWrap
- CopySight Raises $3 Million to Build the Intellectual Property Clearance Layer for Generative AI PR Newswire
- Artificial Intelligence brings up legal concerns in copyright, trademark law Lehigh Valley Business
- Fears of “Anticompetitive Acquiescence” in AI Copyright Do Not Survive Empiricism promarket.org
Reading Insights
0
6
9 min
vs 10 min read
95%
1,914 → 104 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Verge