Mississippi DA Defends Grand Jury Ruling as Wells Family Releases Autopsy and Phone Forensics

2 min read
Source: WLOX
Mississippi DA Defends Grand Jury Ruling as Wells Family Releases Autopsy and Phone Forensics
Photo: WLOX
TL;DR

Jackson County District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath defended the grand jury's no true bill in the death of 18-year-old Nolan Wells, disputing new claims from his family's legal team. Attorney Ben Crump and forensic expert Andrew Garrett presented findings from Wells' phone and a state autopsy, alleging deleted data and a lack of water in Wells' lungs. McIlrath countered that the family withheld full evidence and that the activity described was from other users, not physical access to the device.

Key points

  • McIlrath stated the grand jury's decision was accurate and that the family provided only selected findings, not the full 30-hour digital download.
  • Crump's team argued that the absence of water in Wells' lungs and stomach contradicts the drowning conclusion.
  • Garrett confirmed data was deleted from the phone after Wells' last use but declined to speculate on intent.
  • McIlrath accused Crump of controlling the narrative and failing to share evidence with investigators.

Background

Wells died on Horn Island, Mississippi, on July 4, 2026. A Jackson County grand jury returned a no true bill on September 22, finding no evidence of criminal conduct or racial motivation. The family has continued to seek answers, leading to the release of forensic and autopsy details on September 24.

How outlets are covering it

WLOX and WDSU reported on McIlrath's statement, emphasizing her defense of the grand jury and her criticism of Crump's tactics. Live 5 News and the New York Post focused on the forensic findings, highlighting the lack of water in Wells' lungs and the deleted phone data. The New York Post also noted a 'dry drowning' theory from a forensic pathologist, which was not mentioned in the primary source. All sources agreed on the basic facts of the press conference and the DA's response.

Why it matters

The dispute highlights the tension between public advocacy and legal process in high-profile cases. The family's release of forensic data and autopsy results challenges the grand jury's conclusion, potentially keeping the case in the public eye despite the no true bill.

What to watch

Dr. Roger Mitchell, who conducted an independent autopsy, is expected to discuss his findings in a separate news conference. The family may continue to seek answers through public pressure or legal means.

Share this article

Want the full story? Read the original reporting

Read on WLOX