"Supreme Court's Review of Mifepristone Suit: The Far Right's Influence on Abortion Access"

TL;DR
A pharmacy professor's email complaint led to the retraction of three anti-abortion research papers, highlighting the use of poor-quality evidence by right-wing groups to influence abortion litigation and legislation. The upcoming US Supreme Court case, FDA v AHM, could reshape abortion access and the FDA's authority, with potential implications for other controversial drugs. The anti-abortion movement invests in research to produce evidence for litigation and legislation, often using fringe publications and academic journals. Despite efforts to challenge poor-quality evidence, the battle remains difficult, as journals can be reluctant to correct the scientific record.
Topics:nationhealth-and-law#abortion#anti-abortion-movement#fda#health-and-law#research#supreme-court
- How rightwing groups used junk science to get an abortion case before the US supreme court The Guardian
- Opinion | SCOTUS mifepristone suit is an easy abortion case The Washington Post
- How The Far Right Engineered An Assault On Abortion Access, Even In Blue States HuffPost
- Supreme Court to rule on FDA approval of abortion drug mifepristone Fox News
- Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on medication abortion drug Roll Call
Want the full story? Read the original reporting
Read on The Guardian