"Supreme Court Faces Unusual Choices in Trump Ballot Case"

TL;DR Summary
Trump's lawyers made some odd strategic choices in the Supreme Court ballot case, focusing on a technical argument that Trump is not an "officer of the United States" under the 14th Amendment, potentially appealing to the conservative majority. They left out stronger arguments, such as Trump's constitutional right to encourage supporters to invade the Capitol, and abandoned the argument that disqualification under the 14th Amendment is a nonjusticiable political question. This suggests hedging bets for a potential future trip to the Supreme Court and a lack of confidence in Trump's political position.
- Trump's lawyers make odd choices in Supreme Court ballot case. Slate
- The Supreme Court Shouldn't Punt on This One The Atlantic
- US historians sign brief to support Colorado’s removal of Trump from ballot The Guardian
- Colorado voters seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot tell Supreme Court Jan. 6 'will forever stain' US history The Conversation
- The conservative legal world lines up behind Donald Trump at the Supreme Court CNN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
10
Time Saved
7 min
vs 8 min read
Condensed
94%
1,530 → 92 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate