Forever Immunity and the Fragile Line Between Law and Power
Slate legal analyst Aziz Huq argues that acting AG Todd Blanche’s bid to grant Trump and his family “forever immunity” rests on a nonexistent constitutional power to bind future officials or to immunize future actions from the law. The piece stresses that no branch—Congress or the president—can unilaterally erase future accountability, and that presidential pardons are personal and limited. Blanche’s move would set a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing any administration to permanently shield statutes from enforcement and undermine the rule of law; the article urges rejecting this power grab and reinforcing constitutional limits on executive authority.
